The writer Sarah Lemon probably spoke for many creatives when she posted on Instagram recently, “It feels so dumb to be an artist when the world needs real help, but art saved me more than once, like a lamp handed to me in the dark, so I aim to pass along that light.”
Artists are notoriously prone to that sort of self-doubt. Sadly, so are many arts donors. I encountered Lemon’s comment in a recent MLive column by Kentucky poet Lucie Brooks, in which she lamented a post-election flight of donor money from the arts to “more important” causes.
This moment, Brooks argued, is precisely when donors should be leaning in to support the arts, not abandoning them. She offered evidence for how the arts and artists drive economic activity, create jobs, generate tax revenue, improve children’s academic performance, strengthen mental health, promote civic engagement, and fortify social tolerance.
The person who forwarded Brooks’ column to me, Jamie Bennett, and his fellow American for the Arts co-CEO Suzy Delvalle recently penned their own column asserting the value of the arts for “The Art Newspaper.” Citing the example of public support in Minnesota, they argued that funding the arts (alongside the environment and recreation) produces happier, healthier, and more cohesive communities.
Bennett and Delvalle see a role for the arts in addressing multiple contemporary challenges, “from revitalizing rural economies to addressing the nation’s epidemic of loneliness to connecting more Americans with our national parks and waterways.” But the most significant, they believe, involves “all the ways that artists and arts organizations can help America build an even bigger ‘we,’ one expansive enough to include all of us….”